Friday, February 20, 2015
UN peace coordinator unwelcome by Palestinians
By Nicola Nasser*
The PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation)
did not object to the appointment of new UN special coordinator for the
Middle East peace process Nikolay Mladenov, although he was described
by Tayseer Khaled, a member of the PLO’s Executive Committee, as “persona
non grata” — not trusted by the Palestinians and nor qualified for the job.
The 15-member UN Security Council unanimously
voted to appoint Bulgarian Mladenov, 42, to succeed Holland ’s Robert Serry. He would also be the
representative of the UN secretary general to the International Quartet
(the UN, US, EU and Russia ),
and personal representative of the UN chief to the PLO (the State
of Palestine) and the Palestinian Authority (PA).
Although protocol allows the PLO the right to
reject diplomatic representatives to the organisation, observers cannot
understand why it accepted Mladenov. There is no convincing answer except
a futile desire by the PLO to appease the UN and Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon,
at a time when PLO diplomatic efforts are focused on the UN and its
agencies.
Mladenov not only failed in a similar mission
as UN envoy to Iraq and
resigned, he is someone who describes himself — and is described by the
leaders of the Israeli occupation — as “a good friend of Israel ”. As
Bulgarian foreign minister, Mladenov suggested a “military
alliance” between Bulgaria
and Israel .
He has often spoken about his bias towards “Israel ’s right to exist” and its
right “to defend itself” against Palestinians resisting Israeli
occupation. He even admitted to being a Free Mason, served Jewish
billionaire George Soros, and publicly advocated the US ’s “constructive chaos” policies
in the Arab world. In fact, his Jewish origins may be the least
controversial aspect of him.
Meanwhile, the occupation state does not
hesitate in ignoring the UN, its resolutions and representatives,
disregarding and even assassinating them when necessary. Most recently, Israeli
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman threatened to “expel” Mladenov’s predecessor
Serry as “persona non grata”. Shortly before that, William Schabas, the
head of the UN commission investigating the occupation’s recent war on the
Gaza Strip, resigned after Israel
refused to cooperate with him or allow him to enter the country.
After the UN tolerated the assassination of
its first envoy to Palestine , Swedish Count
Folke Bernadotte in 1948, at the hands of the Zionist Stern Gang led
by Yitzhak Shamir (who later became prime minister of the occupation
state), Israel
was emboldened to adopt a permanent policy of disregarding the UN without
deterrence so far.
In fact, over the past two years the
occupation state has carried out a proxy war against the UN. It has
facilitated logistics, intelligence, firepower and medical assistance to
allow the domination of militias fighting the Syrian regime on its side of
the disengagement zone between the liberated and occupied Arab Syrian
Golan. This compelled the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) to withdraw
after its positions were attacked, dozens of its troops kidnapped and
their weapons and equipment seized. Until today, the UN has not dared to
rectify the situation, which resulted in the collapse of the UN-sponsored
ceasefire and rules of engagement between Syria
and Israel .
The Middle East
is teeming with international peace envoys. The UN has one, so does the US , the EU, Russia ,
China
and the Quartet. Their names change without anything on the ground in
occupied Palestine
changing. Except for expanding the occupation through settlements under
the “peace” umbrella these envoys provide, without any hope that the
international community they represent will be able to effect any real tangible
change for the present and future of the Palestinian people on the ground.
So what can Mladenov do that his predecessors,
the UN, the Quartet, the Arab League and others, couldn’t?
Khaled believes the real test, to remove
Palestinian doubts about Mladenov’s role and mission, will be his position on
the siege on Gaza
and reconstruction there. However, Mladenov’s track record does not indicate
there is cause for optimism. Nor does the track record of “UN special
coordinators” since the creation of the position in 1994 and the
subsequent expansion of its role, as well as the extensive history of choosing
UN and US envoys of Jewish origins or related in the first degree to
Jews, such as Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, John Kerry, Dennis
Ross, Martin Indyk and Quartet representative Tony Blair.
On 6 February, the secretaries general of the
UN and Arab League issued a joint statement expressing “deep concern”
about conditions in Gaza .
They urged Arab and international donors to honour their financial pledges
made at the Cairo Conference last October “as soon as possible”, in order
to rebuild the Gaza Strip and end the siege there. A few days ago, James
Rowley, UN coordinator for humanitarian affairs in the Palestinian
territories occupied since 1967, sent out an “urgent call” for these
commitments to be fulfilled and an “immediate” lift of the siege on Gaza,
because he is “very concerned another conflict will break out” if not.
The Palestinian Foreign Ministry described the
statement by the Quartet on 8 February after it met in Munich , Germany ,
as “short of expectations” because it ignored “all the old-new and evolving
truths” of the occupation state.
The Quartet also said it is “deeply concerned”
about the “difficult conditions in Gaza
where reconstruction needs to be quicker” and urged donors to “pay
their financial pledges as soon as possible”. However, it linked this to
encouraging both sides to “restart negotiations as soon as possible”.
Restarting talks “as soon as possible”,
nonetheless, must await the outcome of general elections in Israel and the US . This means the Palestinian
people must wait for another two years in the vain hope of reconstructing Gaza . It is obvious the
occupation state is enjoying the luxury of time, making easy the
occupation without resistance, as well as building settlements without
deterrence.
Before handing over the reins to Mladenov,
Serry described the failure of donors to pay their dues as “scandalous”
and warned “if there is no progress in the coming months” — not two years
— towards a two-state solution, “the reality will be a one state [solution]”:
the single state of Israel .
Former UN coordinator Terry Rod Larsen said in 2002, “the Palestinian
patient is dying in the interim.”
Last December, Serry warned in his report to
the Security Council that a war in Gaza
“could re-ignite if conditions on the ground do not change” in
the besieged Gaza Strip. It is clear that what Serry described as a
“deadly diplomatic vacuum” coupled with the ongoing siege on rebuilding
Gaza, are an explosive recipe in the besieged Gaza Strip, the outcome and
ramifications of which are unpredictable.
The “scandal” of donors not paying their dues
to rebuild Gaza , as Serry described it, under
the pretext that the PLO government does not control the Gaza Strip, is a
green light given by the international community to the occupation state to
carry out another military assault on national resistance forces in Gaza .
The scandal of Arabs not paying their pledges
at Arab summits to provide the PA with a financial “safety net” amounts to
flagrant Arab pressure on the PLO to accept the Quartet’s proposal to
restart talks with the occupation state “as soon as possible”.
This is Mladenov’s dual mission as the new UN
special coordinator for the Middle East
peace process. PLO negotiators continue to wait for a breakthrough by
“peace” envoys that are imposed on them and appointed by the US and the UN,
although they represent the occupation state. Mladenov is the most recent. He
will not change anything on the ground.
* Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist based in Birzeit,
West Bank of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories (nassernicola@ymail.com). This
article was translated from Arabic and first published by Al-Ahram Weekly on 20
February 2015.